2016 District 7 Candidate Mike Young

Candidate Facts

 7MY profile_mike_young    Name: Mike Young
   Campaign Website: http://www.votemike.org

Candidate Questionnaire

All official candidates were contacted and given the opportunity to answer our Candidate Questionnaire. Any candidate responses edited for length and clarity have been marked as such.

1. Do you ride a bicycle in the city?

No

2. The City has established a goal to at least double the number of bike trips in the next 3 years. Do you support this goal?

Yes

If yes, what would you do as Supervisor to help the city realize it?

I would support policies that would encourage bicycle usage in areas of high demand, e.g. more bike-share locations and more bike lanes where having them makes sense.

3. Our City has embraced and adopted Vision Zero, the goal to eliminate all fatalities and serious injuries on our streets by 2024. Do you support Vision Zero?

Yes

If “Yes,” the city has yet to make significant progress since the introduction of Vision Zero in 2014. In fact, fatalities are on the rise. What would you do as Supervisor to help the city achieve Vision Zero?

I’ve lived and served on U.S. army bases where traffic accidents are the leading cause of avoidable deaths and understand the need to create and enforce traffic policies meant to save lives. In so far as a local elected official can influence transportation policy, I am in favor of reducing speed limits and enhancing safety measures at pedestrian crosswalks. I believe we can strike a balance between increasing pedestrian safety and taking away parking spaces and/or vehicle lanes. After all, drivers become walkers as soon as they step out of their cars.

4. Research and data has shown that building high-quality protected bike infrastructure is the most effective way to increase the number of people who bike. Despite this, there remain very few streets and corridors in San Francisco with protected bike lanes. Do you support the significant expansion of protected bike infrastructure, recognizing that this is often achieved by reallocating space on our streets that may decrease on-street car parking or vehicle travel lanes?

Yes [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

If “Yes,” what is at least one street or corridor in your District that you think would most benefit from a protected bike facility and why?

There are bike lanes in District 7 but they don’t get much use. Bike lanes are most needed on 19th Avenue and West Portal, both of which are locations where implementing bike lanes is problematic.

5. The SF Bicycle Coalition participated in the Mayor’s Transportation 2030 Task Force, which identified significant funding gaps for a safe, reliable transportation system. To continue building out the bike network, the original need until 2030 was $360 million, which has now increased to $660 million, by City estimates. Do you support increased allocation and funding for bike projects to at least match the percentage of San Franciscans who bike?

[NO RESPONSE GIVEN]

6. The Department of Public Health has used data to develop the “high-injury network” to show the 12% of city streets where over 70% of the collisions occur. This map has also shown that low-income communities are disproportionately affected by traffic collisions. If Supervisor, what would you do to prevent collisions in your District at these known locations?

Slower vehicular traffic limits, 4-way walk signs, better cross-walk painting, give PCO’s and police officers broader leeway in enforcing pedestrian, vehicular, and bicycle right of way laws.

7. Market Street is San Francisco’s most-biked street, with nearly 7,000 trips by bike counted here every day. The City is working on the Better Market Street project, which calls for limiting private automobiles, creating a continuous, protected bike lane for the full length of the project from the Embarcadero to Octavia Boulevard and significantly advancing transit and pedestrian-friendly street design. Do you support this plan?

[NO RESPONSE GIVEN]

8. Data has shown that the five most dangerous behaviors are all driver-related offenses: speeding, failure to yield to pedestrians, improper right-hand turns, running red lights and failure to stop at stop signs. The San Francisco Police Department has committed to maintaining 50% of their traffic citations to “Focus on the Five,” a goal they have yet to meet citywide. Do you support Focus on the Five and smart, data-driven enforcement?

Yes [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

9. As Supervisor, what will you do to ensure SFPD focuses enforcement on Focus on the Five or other known issues that make our streets unwelcome to bike on, such as double-parking in bike lanes, rather than ad hoc, complaint-driven enforcement?

My answer to this question would be predicated on the answer I get from the above question: why is the SFPD not able to meet the “Focus on Five” goal.

10. Bay Area Bike Share is in the middle of a game-changing, tenfold expansion of its system to become one of the densest bike share networks in the United States. Do you support the expansion and placement of bike share stations in your District, even if this may mean repurposing of on-street vehicle parking?

Yes [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

District-Specific Questions

1. The SF Bicycle Coalition has been advocating for better bike connections from Balboa Park Station to Lake Merced for years. As Supervisor, what would you recommend to improve the biking and walking connections to and from this important transit hub along Ocean Avenue?

I think the Metro need to go underground before we can have any meaningful discussion about improving Ocean Avenue. I believe Ocean Avenue is unsafe and inefficiently uses available space to maximize transportation efficiency and safety.

2. According to the 2009 San Francisco Bicycle Plan, it is legal to ride a bicycle along the sidewalk of 19th Avenue due to the lack of a north-south bike route here. There is currently a long range planning effort to underground the M Ocean View Muni line and repurpose the onstreet space to transform this freewaylike street into a people friendly boulevard with dedicated bike lanes. Do you support this effort?

Yes

Why or why not?

I would support this if we can find an answer to how vehicular traffic from 101 and 280 will reach the Golden Gate Bridge. This is a battle that was fought years ago and our present situation is the outcome of that battle. Biking and walking are great but closing off 19th Avenue to vehicles without providing a solution to access 101 North is not an acceptable solution.

3. We support a recommendation from the Ocean Beach Master Plan, which calls for a road diet of Great Highway, given the high levels of sand erosion. The result would be to repurpose two lanes of travel to become open streets for people biking and walking. Do you support this recommendation?

Yes [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

4. The Planning Department led the Ocean Avenue Corridor Design Study, which was completed in 2015 after extensive public outreach. Recommendations in the study included a redesign and plaza treatment for the intersection of Ocean, Phelan and Geneva Avenues as well as the inclusion of a westbound bike lane between I280 and Phelan Avenue. Do you support the study’s findings?

Yes

If “Yes,” what would you do as Supervisor to advance the design and implementation of the Ocean Avenue Corridor Design Study?

I would work to ensure that we implement designs that everyone has already agreed upon.

Return to November 2016 Candidate Summaries
 

 

2016 District 7 Candidate Ben Matranga

Candidate Facts

7BM BenMatrangaD7    Name: Ben Matranga
   Campaign Website: benmatranga.com

Candidate Questionnaire

All official candidates were contacted and given the opportunity to answer our Candidate Questionnaire. Any candidate responses edited for length and clarity have been marked as such.

1. Do you ride a bicycle in the city?

Yes

If “Yes,” how often do you ride and for what purpose(s)?

I ride my bike fairly often and for all purposes – commuting, leisure and for exercise. I rode my bike solo across the United States from New York to San Francisco, along the California coast from San Francisco to Mexico, and have circled our beautiful city on a 49 square mile loop many times. I imagine that I have logged more miles in the saddle than any other District 7 candidate and acutely understand the joys and challenges.

2. The City has established a goal to at least double the number of bike trips in the next 3 years. Do you support this goal?

Yes

If yes, what would you do as Supervisor to help the city realize it?

I will work with the SFMTA and other City departments to ensure the proper funding is secured.

3. Our City has embraced and adopted Vision Zero, the goal to eliminate all fatalities and serious injuries on our streets by 2024. Do you support Vision Zero?

Yes

If “Yes,” the city has yet to make significant progress since the introduction of Vision Zero in 2014. In fact, fatalities are on the rise. What would you do as Supervisor to help the city achieve Vision Zero?

Project delivery must be prioritized and I will hold agencies accountable to ensure Vision Zero projects are implemented. Furthermore, I will be a champion of funding for needed Vision Zero projects in all aspects of Vision Zero including engineering, education, enforcement, and evaluation.

4. Research and data has shown that building high-quality protected bike infrastructure is the most effective way to increase the number of people who bike. Despite this, there remain very few streets and corridors in San Francisco with protected bike lanes. Do you support the significant expansion of protected bike infrastructure, recognizing that this is often achieved by reallocating space on our streets that may decrease on-street car parking or vehicle travel lanes?

Yes

If “Yes,” what is at least one street or corridor in your District that you think would most benefit from a protected bike facility and why?

Golden Gate Park is on the edge of our District and would benefit greatly. People of all ages and abilities bicycle throughout Golden Gate Park and it is important we prioritize safety in this beautiful, unique civic space.

5. The SF Bicycle Coalition participated in the Mayor’s Transportation 2030 Task Force, which identified significant funding gaps for a safe, reliable transportation system. To continue building out the bike network, the original need until 2030 was $360 million, which has now increased to $660 million, by City estimates. Do you support increased allocation and funding for bike projects to at least match the percentage of San Franciscans who bike?

Yes

6. The Department of Public Health has used data to develop the “high-injury network” to show the 12% of city streets where over 70% of the collisions occur. This map has also shown that low-income communities are disproportionately affected by traffic collisions. If Supervisor, what would you do to prevent collisions in your District at these known locations?

I would focus on project delivery to ensure needed Vision Zero projects along the high-injury network are prioritized and completed on-schedule.

7. Market Street is San Francisco’s most-biked street, with nearly 7,000 trips by bike counted here every day. The City is working on the Better Market Street project, which calls for limiting private automobiles, creating a continuous, protected bike lane for the full length of the project from the Embarcadero to Octavia Boulevard and significantly advancing transit and pedestrian-friendly street design. Do you support this plan?

Yes 

8. Data has shown that the five most dangerous behaviors are all driver-related offenses: speeding, failure to yield to pedestrians, improper right-hand turns, running red lights and failure to stop at stop signs. The San Francisco Police Department has committed to maintaining 50% of their traffic citations to “Focus on the Five,” a goal they have yet to meet citywide. Do you support Focus on the Five and smart, data-driven enforcement?

Yes 

9. As Supervisor, what will you do to ensure SFPD focuses enforcement on Focus on the Five or other known issues that make our streets unwelcome to bike on, such as double-parking in bike lanes, rather than ad hoc, complaint-driven enforcement?

I would focus on fully staffing the SFPD Traffic Company to ensure the needed staffing is in place to enforce our traffic laws.

10. Bay Area Bike Share is in the middle of a game-changing, tenfold expansion of its system to become one of the densest bike share networks in the United States. Do you support the expansion and placement of bike share stations in your District, even if this may mean repurposing of on-street vehicle parking?

Yes

District-Specific Questions

1. The SF Bicycle Coalition has been advocating for better bike connections from Balboa Park Station to Lake Merced for years. As Supervisor, what would you recommend to improve the biking and walking connections to and from this important transit hub along Ocean Avenue?

I support improving biking and walking connections to and from Balboa Park Station. This area is unique because of the volume of students in the area including students from City College, Lick-Wilmerding High School, Archbishop Riordan High School, San Francisco State University, and numerous other schools is considerable. As Supervisor, I would pursue projects that improve safety and access to transportation for students and others in the area.

2. According to the 2009 San Francisco Bicycle Plan, it is legal to ride a bicycle along the sidewalk of 19th Avenue due to the lack of a northsouth bike route here. There is currently a long range planning effort to underground the M Ocean View Muni line and repurpose the on street space to transform this freewaylike street into a people friendly boulevard with dedicated bike lanes. Do you support this effort?

Yes 

 

3. We support a recommendation from the Ocean Beach Master Plan, which calls for a road diet of Great Highway, given the high levels of sand erosion. The result would be to repurpose two lanes of travel to become open streets for people biking and walking. Do you support this recommendation?

Yes [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

4. The Planning Department led the Ocean Avenue Corridor Design Study, which was completed in 2015 after extensive public outreach. Recommendations in the study included a redesign and plaza treatment for the intersection of Ocean, Phelan and Geneva Avenues as well as the inclusion of a westbound bike lane between I280 and Phelan Avenue. Do you support the study’s findings?

Yes

If “Yes,” what would you do as Supervisor to advance the design and implementation of the Ocean Avenue Corridor Design Study?

I would work to ensure proper funding and on-going community outreach is secured.

Return to November 2016 Candidate Summaries
 

 

2016 District 1 Candidate Jason Jungreis

Candidate Facts

Jason Jungreis headshot    Name: Jason Jungreis
   Campaign Website: www.jasonjungreisforsupervisor2016.com

Candidate Questionnaire

All official candidates were contacted and given the opportunity to answer our Candidate Questionnaire. Any candidate responses edited for length and clarity have been marked as such.

1. Do you ride a bicycle in the city?

Yes

If “Yes,” how often do you ride and for what purpose(s)?

Recreation, errands, pleasure, occasional commuting. I have a regular bike and an electric bike. My son commutes on his bike. I ride several times a week on average.

2. The City has established a goal to at least double the number of bike trips in the next 3 years. Do you support this goal?

Yes [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

If yes, what would you do as Supervisor to help the city realize it?

I am unfamiliar with the quantitative analysis that supports a goal of 8%, and despite on-line searches generally and of the SFBC, I could not locate a specific purpose for 8% (as opposed to 7% or 9%). It seems a laudable goal. In order to achieve it, I encourage SFBC to more fully embrace electric bicycles. Note that my agenda has specific support for bicycles, electric bicycles, and bulk buyer programs to reduce the cost of bicycles for residents. 

3. Our City has embraced and adopted Vision Zero, the goal to eliminate all fatalities and serious injuries on our streets by 2024. Do you support Vision Zero?

Yes

If “Yes,” the city has yet to make significant progress since the introduction of Vision Zero in 2014. In fact, fatalities are on the rise. What would you do as Supervisor to help the city achieve Vision Zero?

Bright striping on the roadway with appropriate signage is inexpensive and quick. Similarly, I advocate bicycle lanes be separated wherever possible by inexpensive and readily-installed rigid plastic bollards.

4. Research and data has shown that building high-quality protected bike infrastructure is the most effective way to increase the number of people who bike. Despite this, there remain very few streets and corridors in San Francisco with protected bike lanes. Do you support the significant expansion of protected bike infrastructure, recognizing that this is often achieved by reallocating space on our streets that may decrease on-street car parking or vehicle travel lanes?

Yes [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

If “Yes,” what is at least one street or corridor in your District that you think would most benefit from a protected bike facility and why?

The Richmond benefits from very good current bike lanes on Lake, Cabrillo, and various north-south routes. I would like to see JFK in Golden Gate Park striped all the way to the western end. Otherwise, bicycle parking on Geary would be the most beneficial step. The Richmond does not require bicycle lane protection.

5. The SF Bicycle Coalition participated in the Mayor’s Transportation 2030 Task Force, which identified significant funding gaps for a safe, reliable transportation system. To continue building out the bike network, the original need until 2030 was $360 million, which has now increased to $660 million, by City estimates. Do you support increased allocation and funding for bike projects to at least match the percentage of San Franciscans who bike?

No [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

6. The Department of Public Health has used data to develop the “high-injury network” to show the 12% of city streets where over 70% of the collisions occur. This map has also shown that low-income communities are disproportionately affected by traffic collisions. If Supervisor, what would you do to prevent collisions in your District at these known locations?

I do not believe there is any location in the Richmond with a high accident rate other than Arguello, and that is in the process of an upgrade. As to other intersections, I believe traffic light cameras that ensure enforcement of the law is the best approach, as there would be far fewer collisions with certainty in the enforcement of the law. (However, I do not believe fines should increase simply do to enforcement through a camera.)

7. Market Street is San Francisco’s most-biked street, with nearly 7,000 trips by bike counted here every day. The City is working on the Better Market Street project, which calls for limiting private automobiles, creating a continuous, protected bike lane for the full length of the project from the Embarcadero to Octavia Boulevard and significantly advancing transit and pedestrian-friendly street design. Do you support this plan?

Yes [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

8. Data has shown that the five most dangerous behaviors are all driver-related offenses: speeding, failure to yield to pedestrians, improper right-hand turns, running red lights and failure to stop at stop signs. The San Francisco Police Department has committed to maintaining 50% of their traffic citations to “Focus on the Five,” a goal they have yet to meet citywide. Do you support Focus on the Five and smart, data-driven enforcement?

No [RESPONSE TRUNCATED] 

9. As Supervisor, what will you do to ensure SFPD focuses enforcement on Focus on the Five or other known issues that make our streets unwelcome to bike on, such as double-parking in bike lanes, rather than ad hoc, complaint-driven enforcement?

I support vigorous enforcement of all laws. I also support vigorous enforcement of all laws against not only drivers, but also against bicyclists and pedestrians. Certainty in the enforcement of law is the single best mechanism to avoid collisions. However, camera-aided ticketing should not an additive cost to the cost of the issued citation.

10. Bay Area Bike Share is in the middle of a game-changing, tenfold expansion of its system to become one of the densest bike share networks in the United States. Do you support the expansion and placement of bike share stations in your District, even if this may mean repurposing of on-street vehicle parking?

[NO RESPONSE GIVEN]

District-Specific Questions

1. A recent tragedy occurred on June 22, where a person biking was hit and killed by a driver on JFK Drive near 30th Avenue, which is located in District 1. The SF Bicycle Coalition is advocating for protected bike lanes for the western half of JFK Drive to make Golden Gate Park a place for people rather than vehicle through traffic or on-street parking. As Supervisor, would you support our ask, and what would you do to prevent such crashes on JFK Drive?

I disagree with the use of protected bike lanes anywhere, if by protected you mean cement-curbed barriers. These are expensive and detrimental to both bikes and cars in that they serve virtually no purpose that plastic bollards will not serve. Further, the JFK Drive tragedy was the result of utter recklessness by the driver of a stolen car. On the one hand, that sort of thing is potentially unstoppable and not the measure by which policy should be created. On the other hand, helping to prevent such crimes and helping ensuring arrest for such a crime would diminish such crime.

2. In addition to improved infrastructure, we are advocating for an expansion of car-free, open streets space in Golden Gate Park, similar to Car-Free Sundays or Healthy Saturdays. As Supervisor, would you support this ask?

Yes [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

3. We support a recommendation from the Ocean Beach Master Plan, which calls for a road diet of Great Highway, given the high levels of sand erosion. The result would be to repurpose two lanes of travel to become open streets for people biking and walking. Do you support this recommendation?

No [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

Return to November 2016 Candidate Summaries
 

 

2016 District 1 Candidate Andy Thornley

Candidate Facts

1AT    Name: Andy Thornley
   Campaign Website: Thornley2016.com

Candidate Questionnaire

All official candidates were contacted and given the opportunity to answer our Candidate Questionnaire. Any candidate responses edited for length and clarity have been marked as such.

1. Do you ride a bicycle in the city?

Yes

If “Yes,” how often do you ride and for what purpose(s)?

Nearly every day, for every reason, shopping, commuting, visiting, joyriding.

2. The City has established a goal to at least double the number of bike trips in the next 3 years. Do you support this goal?

Yes

If yes, what would you do as Supervisor to help the city realize it?

I would energetically prioritize funding and resources and political support to elevate the bicycle transportation system to a high level of continuity and comfort and completeness, via bicycle system infrastructure (bikeways, secure bike parking, wayfinding systems, etc) and programs (bike education for kids and adults and drivers, safe routes to school, measured and meaningful safe streets enforcement, etc). At the same time I would work with focus and energy to improve and strengthen transit in the city, Muni and regional systems, and other sustainable mobility choices to allow more San Franciscans to get along with less car.

3. Our City has embraced and adopted Vision Zero, the goal to eliminate all fatalities and serious injuries on our streets by 2024. Do you support Vision Zero?

Yes

If “Yes,” the city has yet to make significant progress since the introduction of Vision Zero in 2014. In fact, fatalities are on the rise. What would you do as Supervisor to help the city achieve Vision Zero?

I would champion the implementation of proven engineering countermeasures on our streets (sidewalk extensions, intersection daylighting, intersection fixes, etc); support automated speed enforcement legislation in Sacramento, and implementation here once it’s approved; work with the SFPD & SFMTA to carry out consistent, measured, and sensible “safe streets” enforcement (SFPD Richmond Station has been a leader on Focus on the Five), support and prioritize Geary Blvd pedestrian realm enhancements, Fulton Street fixes, Arguello Blvd fixes (paint now and more soon); provide Safe Routes to JFK Drive; and dramatically constrain car circulation in Golden Gate Park.

4. Research and data has shown that building high-quality protected bike infrastructure is the most effective way to increase the number of people who bike. Despite this, there remain very few streets and corridors in San Francisco with protected bike lanes. Do you support the significant expansion of protected bike infrastructure, recognizing that this is often achieved by reallocating space on our streets that may decrease on-street car parking or vehicle travel lanes?

Yes

If “Yes,” what is at least one street or corridor in your District that you think would most benefit from a protected bike facility and why?

I support transforming Arguello Boulevard into a true greenway that connects the Presidio and Golden Gate Park and moves kids and families and commuters and shoppers to neighborhood and crosstown destinations. Arguello Blvd has already benefitted from an early road diet (2001) and I’m fully supportive of the SFMTA’s proposals to further tame and re-shape Arguello in the near term, and I’ll work to make even more ambitious physical changes to Arguello for safer and more comfortable biking for all ages and abilities.

5. The SF Bicycle Coalition participated in the Mayor’s Transportation 2030 Task Force, which identified significant funding gaps for a safe, reliable transportation system. To continue building out the bike network, the original need until 2030 was $360 million, which has now increased to $660 million, by City estimates. Do you support increased allocation and funding for bike projects to at least match the percentage of San Franciscans who bike?

Yes

6. The Department of Public Health has used data to develop the “high-injury network” to show the 12% of city streets where over 70% of the collisions occur. This map has also shown that low-income communities are disproportionately affected by traffic collisions. If Supervisor, what would you do to prevent collisions in your District at these known locations?

D1 is cursed with deadly streets as much as any district in SF – Geary Boulevard is one of the most perilous streets in the city, and Fulton, California, Arguello, and JFK Drive are likewise dreadful and sometimes deadly. Not surprisingly, but inexcusably, kids and seniors are overrepresented in the numbers of people seriously injured and killed on D1 streets. We know what to do, they’re the same things we need to do to realize Vision Zero – I would energetically support engineering, enforcement, and legislative changes (e.g. automated speed enforcement) to realize real safety improvements in D1 and citywide.

7. Market Street is San Francisco’s most-biked street, with nearly 7,000 trips by bike counted here every day. The City is working on the Better Market Street project, which calls for limiting private automobiles, creating a continuous, protected bike lane for the full length of the project from the Embarcadero to Octavia Boulevard and significantly advancing transit and pedestrian-friendly street design. Do you support this plan?

Yes 

8. Data has shown that the five most dangerous behaviors are all driver-related offenses: speeding, failure to yield to pedestrians, improper right-hand turns, running red lights and failure to stop at stop signs. The San Francisco Police Department has committed to maintaining 50% of their traffic citations to “Focus on the Five,” a goal they have yet to meet citywide. Do you support Focus on the Five and smart, data-driven enforcement?

Yes 

9. As Supervisor, what will you do to ensure SFPD focuses enforcement on Focus on the Five or other known issues that make our streets unwelcome to bike on, such as double-parking in bike lanes, rather than ad hoc, complaint-driven enforcement?

SFPD Richmond Station has been a leader in focusing traffic enforcement resources on the most dangerous behaviors and locations in D1, and I would guide SFPD commanders to build on Richmond Station’s example for all districts. I’ll continue to advocate for SFPD’s Traffic Company realignment to a true “Safe Streets” unit (with energetic coordination and engagement from SFMTA and DPH and advocates) – getting more officers patrolling on bikes more of the time is essential, toward reducing “windshield perspective” and building empathy and effectiveness in addressing widespread pernicious hazards like double-parking and failure to yield at intersections and elsewhere.

10. Bay Area Bike Share is in the middle of a game-changing, tenfold expansion of its system to become one of the densest bike share networks in the United States. Do you support the expansion and placement of bike share stations in your District, even if this may mean repurposing of on-street vehicle parking?

Yes

District-Specific Questions

1. A recent tragedy occurred on June 22, where a person biking was hit and killed by a driver on JFK Drive near 30th Avenue, which is located in District 1. The SF Bicycle Coalition is advocating for protected bike lanes for the western half of JFK Drive to make Golden Gate Park a place for people rather than vehicle through traffic or on-street parking. As Supervisor, would you support our ask, and what would you do to prevent such crashes on JFK Drive?

Probably, I’d have to see the proposal; JFK Drive west of Transverse is narrower than the eastern extent, and there were few cars parked on JFK Drive at 30th Ave on the evening of June 22, so effectively no parking buffer to protect a bike rider. As a near-term action I recommend making key segments of JFK Drive one-way for cars to eliminate through motor traffic, as well as one-waying 30th and 36th Avenues and a few other segments; see Thornley2016.com/FixJFK for details. This fix can be implemented quickly – this year – with paint and signs and enforcement.

2. In addition to improved infrastructure, we are advocating for an expansion of car-free, open streets space in Golden Gate Park, similar to Car-Free Sundays or Healthy Saturdays. As Supervisor, would you support this ask?

Yes 

3. We support a recommendation from the Ocean Beach Master Plan, which calls for a road diet of Great Highway, given the high levels of sand erosion. The result would be to repurpose two lanes of travel to become open streets for people biking and walking. Do you support this recommendation?

Yes

Return to November 2016 Candidate Summaries
 

 

2016 District 1 Candidate Brian Larkin

Candidate Facts

On Geary - w photoshop edits (1)    Name: Brian Larkin
   Campaign Website: www.LarkinForDistrictOne.com

Candidate Questionnaire

All official candidates were contacted and given the opportunity to answer our Candidate Questionnaire. Any candidate responses edited for length and clarity have been marked as such.

1. Do you ride a bicycle in the city?

Yes

If “Yes,” how often do you ride and for what purpose(s)?

Three to five times a week. Twice a week to go to the Presidio YMCA, and at least once more and usually two or three other times to run errands (grocery, banking, post office, hardware store)

2. The City has established a goal to at least double the number of bike trips in the next 3 years. Do you support this goal?

Yes

If yes, what would you do as Supervisor to help the city realize it?

Support the construction a network of Type III bicycle lanes.

3. Our City has embraced and adopted Vision Zero, the goal to eliminate all fatalities and serious injuries on our streets by 2024. Do you support Vision Zero?

Yes

If “Yes,” the city has yet to make significant progress since the introduction of Vision Zero in 2014. In fact, fatalities are on the rise. What would you do as Supervisor to help the city achieve Vision Zero?

More & regular enforcement of traffic laws, especially against speeding and DUI. Better public transit service, especially an underground extension of the Muni Metro system out Geary Blvd to the Richmond District – this, by the way, is my main reason for running.

4. Research and data has shown that building high-quality protected bike infrastructure is the most effective way to increase the number of people who bike. Despite this, there remain very few streets and corridors in San Francisco with protected bike lanes. Do you support the significant expansion of protected bike infrastructure, recognizing that this is often achieved by reallocating space on our streets that may decrease on-street car parking or vehicle travel lanes?

Yes [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

If “Yes,” what is at least one street or corridor in your District that you think would most benefit from a protected bike facility and why?

The east/west street that I travel the most is Lake Street. It has a type II bike lane, but a type III lane (physically separated from car traffic) would make it more attractive for cyclists and encourage its use.

5. The SF Bicycle Coalition participated in the Mayor’s Transportation 2030 Task Force, which identified significant funding gaps for a safe, reliable transportation system. To continue building out the bike network, the original need until 2030 was $360 million, which has now increased to $660 million, by City estimates. Do you support increased allocation and funding for bike projects to at least match the percentage of San Franciscans who bike?

Yes [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

6. The Department of Public Health has used data to develop the “high-injury network” to show the 12% of city streets where over 70% of the collisions occur. This map has also shown that low-income communities are disproportionately affected by traffic collisions. If Supervisor, what would you do to prevent collisions in your District at these known locations?

Work with the MTA planners to ensure that the problems at the high-injury network locations are identified and mitigated.

7. Market Street is San Francisco’s most-biked street, with nearly 7,000 trips by bike counted here every day. The City is working on the Better Market Street project, which calls for limiting private automobiles, creating a continuous, protected bike lane for the full length of the project from the Embarcadero to Octavia Boulevard and significantly advancing transit and pedestrian-friendly street design. Do you support this plan?

Yes [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

8. Data has shown that the five most dangerous behaviors are all driver-related offenses: speeding, failure to yield to pedestrians, improper right-hand turns, running red lights and failure to stop at stop signs. The San Francisco Police Department has committed to maintaining 50% of their traffic citations to “Focus on the Five,” a goal they have yet to meet citywide. Do you support Focus on the Five and smart, data-driven enforcement?

Yes [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

9. As Supervisor, what will you do to ensure SFPD focuses enforcement on Focus on the Five or other known issues that make our streets unwelcome to bike on, such as double-parking in bike lanes, rather than ad hoc, complaint-driven enforcement?

I’d meet with the commander of Richmond Station on this. I agree that ad hoc measures are only effective in a small area and a short time. The development of a comprehensive program with regular review of its results would be a good start.

10. Bay Area Bike Share is in the middle of a game-changing, tenfold expansion of its system to become one of the densest bike share networks in the United States. Do you support the expansion and placement of bike share stations in your District, even if this may mean repurposing of on-street vehicle parking?

Yes [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

District-Specific Questions

1. A recent tragedy occurred on June 22, where a person biking was hit and killed by a driver on JFK Drive near 30th Avenue, which is located in District 1. The SF Bicycle Coalition is advocating for protected bike lanes for the western half of JFK Drive to make Golden Gate Park a place for people rather than vehicle through traffic or on-street parking. As Supervisor, would you support our ask, and what would you do to prevent such crashes on JFK Drive?

I would support expanding the bike network in GGP.

2. In addition to improved infrastructure, we are advocating for an expansion of car-free, open streets space in Golden Gate Park, similar to Car-Free Sundays or Healthy Saturdays. As Supervisor, would you support this ask?

Yes [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

3. We support a recommendation from the Ocean Beach Master Plan, which calls for a road diet of Great Highway, given the high levels of sand erosion. The result would be to repurpose two lanes of travel to become open streets for people biking and walking. Do you support this recommendation?

Yes [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

Return to November 2016 Candidate Summaries
 

 

2016 State Assembly District 17 Candidate David Chiu

Candidate Facts

S17DC Untitled    Name: David Chiu
   Campaign Website: www.votedavidchiu.com

Candidate Questionnaire

All official candidates were contacted and given the opportunity to answer our Candidate Questionnaire. Any candidate responses edited for length and clarity have been marked as such.

1. Do you ride a bicycle in the city or in Sacramento?

Yes

If “Yes,” how often do you ride and for what purpose(s)?

Yes, as I have for decades, I ride many times each week. I keep a bike in both San Francisco and Sacramento. In Sacramento, I frequently ride to and from my Capitol office as well as to meetings around the Capitol. In San Francisco, I’ve been a bicycle commuter since I moved to San Francisco 20 years ago.

2. One of the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition’s top state legislative priorities is Automated Speed Enforcement, recognizing that speed is the top factor in traffic collision fatalities in San Francisco. The San Francisco Board of Supervisors has passed a resolution in support of ASE and it is the SF Municipal Transportation Agency’s top legislative priority in Sacramento. Do you support legislation that would authorize the use of ASE as a pilot in San Francisco?

Yes

If “Yes,” would you sponsor this bill and why? If “No,” what change would make you consider supporting such legislation?

I support ASE, and I am looking closely at sponsoring it in the next legislative session. Since taking office, I have been working with ASE advocates in San Francisco as well as the SFMTA to develop and implement a strategy for passing this bill. It will be an enormous challenge given the numerous opponents and the repeated failed attempts to pass such a policy in the past, but I look forward to the effort.

3. Our City has embraced and adopted Vision Zero, the goal to eliminate all fatalities and serious injuries on our streets by 2024. Do you support Vision Zero? 

Yes

If “Yes,” the city has yet to make significant progress since the introduction of Vision Zero in 2014. In fact, fatalities are on the rise. What would you do as State Assemblymember to help the city achieve Vision Zero?

I have strongly supported Vision Zero since the moment it was envisioned. There is very little awareness in Sacramento of Vision Zero as a policy framework and a path to saving lives. I authored a bill my first year to make permanent the SFMTA’s Transit Only Lane Enforcement program and to expand it to enforce “Block the Box” violations, which gave me the opportunity to talk to my colleagues about Vision Zero. We need to make ASE a reality, fund Vision Zero projects, and work to make Vision Zero a part of the workplan for the State’s transportation agencies

4. The draft California Transportation Plan 2040 calls for a doubling of bicycling statewide. Caltrans has committed to tripling bicycle mode share from 1.5% to 4.5% by 2020. As State Assemblymember, would you support increasing bicycle trips in California? 

Yes

If “Yes,” what would you do as State Assemblymember to help grow the number of people biking statewide?

In 2010, while President of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, I sponsored the resolution to set San Francisco’s ambitious bicycling mode share goal of 20% by 2020. As a State Assemblymember, I support increasing bicycling as much as possible and have been a strong advocate for bikes. I look forward to working with both the CA Bike Coalition (whose priority bill on electric bicycles I authored and passed in 2015) and the SFBC on the wide range of efforts – from funding infrastructure to spurring cultural changes at Caltrans – that will be needed to make significant progress. [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

5. California’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund has been used to fund bicycle projects with the goal of reducing state greenhouse gas emissions. Do you support increased allocation and funding for bike projects? 

Yes

If “Yes,” what funding opportunities do you see at the state level to get bicycle projects on the ground?

The GGRF funds that come from the Cap & Trade program should provide significant resources to bicycle projects statewide. Unfortunately, the allocation of many of these funds has been stuck in political limbo, but I am committed to directing as many dollars as possible to funding sustainable transportation options like transit, bicycling and walking.

6. The California Air Resources Board recently included bike share in its Car Sharing and Mobility Options pilot program, opening up funding opportunities to expand bike share in low-income areas. Do you support the expansion of bike share and other bicycle infrastructure into low-income areas?

Yes

If “Yes,” how would you address low-income areas’ transportation needs as State Assemblymember?

Low-income communities are disproportionately impacted by pollution from cars and trucks, and we must do more to bring environmentally sustainable options to these areas, including expanding bike share and other bicycle infrastructure. One idea is to make changes to the CalEnviroScreen to make more low-income communities in the Bay Area eligible for GGRF allocations.

Return to November 2016 Candidate Summaries

2016 State Assembly District 19 Candidate Phil Ting

Candidate Facts

S19PT Ting 038 crop    Name: Phil Ting
   Campaign Website: www.philting.com

Candidate Questionnaire

All official candidates were contacted and given the opportunity to answer our Candidate Questionnaire. Any candidate responses edited for length and clarity have been marked as such.

1. Do you ride a bicycle in the city or in Sacramento?

Yes

If “Yes,” how often do you ride and for what purpose(s)?

I ride some in San Francisco, but I ride more in Sacramento because it’s flatter. I find it to be a good way to both commute to and from the Capitol from my Sacramento residence as well as to attend meetings and events around the city.

2. One of the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition’s top state legislative priorities is Automated Speed Enforcement, recognizing that speed is the top factor in traffic collision fatalities in San Francisco. The San Francisco Board of Supervisors has passed a resolution in support of ASE and it is the SF Municipal Transportation Agency’s top legislative priority in Sacramento. Do you support legislation that would authorize the use of ASE as a pilot in San Francisco?

Yes

If “Yes,” would you sponsor this bill and why? If “No,” what change would make you consider supporting such legislation?

I have had several conversations with organizations such as yourself and WalkSF about possible ASE legislation. I remain open to the possibility of sponsoring such legislation, but we will need to continue to work together to address serious concerns related to technological integrity, privacy of our citizens and due process that are critical when implementing automated traffic enforcement.

3. Our City has embraced and adopted Vision Zero, the goal to eliminate all fatalities and serious injuries on our streets by 2024. Do you support Vision Zero? 

Yes

If “Yes,” the city has yet to make significant progress since the introduction of Vision Zero in 2014. In fact, fatalities are on the rise. What would you do as State Assemblymember to help the city achieve Vision Zero?

In 2013, I authored and passed AB 707, which increases speed warning signage around senior centers, helping to protect an especially vulnerable population of pedestrians. Additionally, I am a co-author of this year’s AB 1677, which would develop standards for inspections that would ensure that the tour buses that roam our city’s streets are in safe working order. After the unfortunate death of a city worker in front of City Hall and the injury of several pedestrians near Union Square by a runaway tour bus, these inspection regimens are desperately needed. This bill is currently in the State Senate. [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

4. The draft California Transportation Plan 2040 calls for a doubling of bicycling statewide. Caltrans has committed to tripling bicycle mode share from 1.5% to 4.5% by 2020. As State Assemblymember, would you support increasing bicycle trips in California? 

Yes

If “Yes,” what would you do as State Assemblymember to help grow the number of people biking statewide?

I am proud of my legislative record supporting making bicycling easier and safer in California. In 2014, I authored and passed AB 1193, which provides for Caltrans to work with localities to design and build separated and protected bike lanes. And last year, I co-authored and passed AB 40, ensuring that bicyclists and pedestrians will not be charged tolls to cross our state’s bridges.

5. California’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund has been used to fund bicycle projects with the goal of reducing state greenhouse gas emissions. Do you support increased allocation and funding for bike projects? 

Yes

If “Yes,” what funding opportunities do you see at the state level to get bicycle projects on the ground?

I believe that we should continue to use GGRF funds for bike projects, if the fund can be made sufficiently stable. The Legislature is currently working on a comprehensive transportation package, and I am working with colleagues to include funds for cycling projects.

6. The California Air Resources Board recently included bike share in its Car Sharing and Mobility Options pilot program, opening up funding opportunities to expand bike share in low-income areas. Do you support the expansion of bike share and other bicycle infrastructure into low-income areas?

Yes

If “Yes,” how would you address low-income areas’ transportation needs as State Assemblymember?

San Francisco has seen a rapid recent increase in bike sharing stations throughout the city. We need to incentivize the expansion of these stations into low-income areas and to subsidize bike share membership to make it free or at least affordable for all.

Return to November 2016 Candidate Summaries

2016 District 1 Candidate Sandra Lee Fewer

Candidate Facts

1SLF Sandra Lee Fewer    Name: Sandra Lee Fewer
   Campaign Website: www.sandrafewer.com

Candidate Questionnaire

All official candidates were contacted and given the opportunity to answer our Candidate Questionnaire. Any candidate responses edited for length and clarity have been marked as such.

1. Do you ride a bicycle in the city?

Yes

If “Yes,” how often do you ride and for what purpose(s)?

I ride occasionally, for recreation and exercise. But my husband more so—he has ridden for years, founding the SFPD Bicycle Unit as an officer and taking my daughters to ride in Critical Mass when they were younger.

2. The City has established a goal to at least double the number of bike trips in the next 3 years. Do you support this goal?

Yes

If yes, what would you do as Supervisor to help the city realize it?

I would be interested in looking at increased funding for transportation, especially for cycling infrastructure, and in alignment with the Transportation 2030 task force work. As a school board commissioner, I know that many of our families struggle with the cost of transportation and while there are great organizations like PODER and the Bike Coalition working to address accessibility to bicycles, I think there could be increased investment in educational programs for families, low-income residents and communities of color. As a Transit Authority Commissioner, I would support stronger oversight from SFCTA and better coordination with SFMTA and key departments. [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

3. Our City has embraced and adopted Vision Zero, the goal to eliminate all fatalities and serious injuries on our streets by 2024. Do you support Vision Zero?

Yes 

If “Yes,” the city has yet to make significant progress since the introduction of Vision Zero in 2014. In fact, fatalities are on the rise. What would you do as Supervisor to help the city achieve Vision Zero?

As a School Board Commissioner, I authored the resolution in support of Vision Zero– this is clearly a priority but we have some work to do to make the goal realized. I would work to strengthen the role of the SFCTA’s Vision Zero committee in terms of oversight and metric tracking to ensure we are evaluating our progress. I think that we need to expediate any funds focusing on key safety improvements, and develop accountability measures for any delays in such safety projects.

4. Research and data has shown that building high-quality protected bike infrastructure is the most effective way to increase the number of people who bike. Despite this, there remain very few streets and corridors in San Francisco with protected bike lanes. Do you support the significant expansion of protected bike infrastructure, recognizing that this is often achieved by reallocating space on our streets that may decrease on-street car parking or vehicle travel lanes?

Yes [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

If “Yes,” what is at least one street or corridor in your District that you think would most benefit from a protected bike facility and why?

I think Golden Gate Park, especially JFK Drive, would be a great place to start. With thirteen million annual visitors, Golden Gate Park must be a safe and inviting place for everyone, particularly people walking and biking. It is unacceptable that people like Heather Miller lose their lives due to half-measures.

5. The SF Bicycle Coalition participated in the Mayor’s Transportation 2030 Task Force, which identified significant funding gaps for a safe, reliable transportation system. To continue building out the bike network, the original need until 2030 was $360 million, which has now increased to $660 million, by City estimates. Do you support increased allocation and funding for bike projects to at least match the percentage of San Franciscans who bike?

Yes [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

6. The Department of Public Health has used data to develop the “high-injury network” to show the 12% of city streets where over 70% of the collisions occur. This map has also shown that low-income communities are disproportionately affected by traffic collisions. If Supervisor, what would you do to prevent collisions in your District at these known locations?

In the Richmond District, safety is a priority concern for many residents, for both cyclists and pedestrians. My husband, a former police officer, retired as a traffic cop out of Richmond Station after 35 years on the force. I have discussed with him at length the measures used for traffic calming and the level of effectiveness for each. I believe that the primary method of traffic calming must be traffic signage and traffic devices, focusing SFPD resources on the most dangerous streets and intersections. These measures will benefit not just people biking, but also pedestrians, families and seniors. [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

7. Market Street is San Francisco’s most-biked street, with nearly 7,000 trips by bike counted here every day. The City is working on the Better Market Street project, which calls for limiting private automobiles, creating a continuous, protected bike lane for the full length of the project from the Embarcadero to Octavia Boulevard and significantly advancing transit and pedestrian-friendly street design. Do you support this plan?

Yes 

8. Data has shown that the five most dangerous behaviors are all driver-related offenses: speeding, failure to yield to pedestrians, improper right-hand turns, running red lights and failure to stop at stop signs. The San Francisco Police Department has committed to maintaining 50% of their traffic citations to “Focus on the Five,” a goal they have yet to meet citywide. Do you support Focus on the Five and smart, data-driven enforcement?

Yes 

9. As Supervisor, what will you do to ensure SFPD focuses enforcement on Focus on the Five or other known issues that make our streets unwelcome to bike on, such as double-parking in bike lanes, rather than ad hoc, complaint-driven enforcement?

My husband, a 35 year veteran of SFPD, not only served as a traffic cop but also started the SFPD Bicycle Patrol, writing the first grant and training officers. He knows well the importance of coordinated efforts within the police department to ensure street safety for our residents. The Focus on the Five is a critical program and in order for SFPD to be aligned, we must ensure station accountability and transparency around citation data collected, and that is there is a comprehensive program in place to train and support rank and file officers on the model.

10. Bay Area Bike Share is in the middle of a game-changing, tenfold expansion of its system to become one of the densest bike share networks in the United States. Do you support the expansion and placement of bike share stations in your District, even if this may mean repurposing of on-street vehicle parking?

Yes [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

District-Specific Questions

1. A recent tragedy occurred on June 22, where a person biking was hit and killed by a driver on JFK Drive near 30th Avenue, which is located in District 1. The SF Bicycle Coalition is advocating for protected bike lanes for the western half of JFK Drive to make Golden Gate Park a place for people rather than vehicle through traffic or on-street parking. As Supervisor, would you support our ask, and what would you do to prevent such crashes on JFK Drive?

Yes, I think would be in support of an extension of the protected bike lane, but would also want to assess the impact of that expansion where the lanes narrow on drivers with disabilities, etc. Heather Miller’s death was tragic and we should absolutely take necessary measures to prevent more fatalities. Traffic calming measures, as mentioned above, are necessary to slow down cars and protect cyclists and pedestrians both in bike lanes and crosswalks.

2. In addition to improved infrastructure, we are advocating for an expansion of car-free, open streets space in Golden Gate Park, similar to Car-Free Sundays or Healthy Saturdays. As Supervisor, would you support this ask?

Yes 

3. We support a recommendation from the Ocean Beach Master Plan, which calls for a road diet of Great Highway, given the high levels of sand erosion. The result would be to repurpose two lanes of travel to become open streets for people biking and walking. Do you support this recommendation?

Yes [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

Return to November 2016 Candidate Summaries
 

 

2016 State Senate District 11 Candidate Scott Wiener

Candidate Facts

S11SW    Name: Scott Wiener
   Campaign Website: www.scottwiener.com

Candidate Questionnaire

All official candidates were contacted and given the opportunity to answer our Candidate Questionnaire. Any candidate responses edited for length and clarity have been marked as such.

1. Do you ride a bicycle in the city or in Sacramento?

Yes

If “Yes,” how often do you ride and for what purpose(s)?

I bike occasionally. I use public transit 7 days a week and walk. I champion all sustainable modes of transportation. Every politician professes support for transit. I go to the mat for better transit, biking, pedestrian access. I work locally/regionally on many transit needs. I authored multiple measures to increase investment in transit/bike infrastructure/complete streets, including 2011 streets bond, Prop B (tying transit funding to population growth), expanding transit impact fees paid by developers, transportation sales tax for November (which Jane Kim opposed). I authored legislation to require a Subway Master Plan and Late Night Transportation Plan.

2. One of the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition’s top state legislative priorities is Automated Speed Enforcement, recognizing that speed is the top factor in traffic collision fatalities in San Francisco. The San Francisco Board of Supervisors has passed a resolution in support of ASE and it is the SF Municipal Transportation Agency’s top legislative priority in Sacramento. Do you support legislation that would authorize the use of ASE as a pilot in San Francisco?

Yes

If “Yes,” would you sponsor this bill and why? If “No,” what change would make you consider supporting such legislation?

Yes, I would sponsor an automated speed enforcement bill. We need to take bold steps to reduce speeds, improve enforcement, and make streets safer. We will never have enough police officers doing traffic enforcement to solve our speeding problem through police observation alone.

3. What have you learned as District Supervisor in San Francisco that will help inform you if elected State Senator?

  • If you’re unwilling to break glass, you won’t get anything done. For example, when I authored Prop B – which ties transit funding to population growth and generates significant funding for transit/bike/pedestrian – there was enormous pressure to back off. I didn’t, and we thus have more funding.
  • Working with well-organized, focused, visionary advocates makes it much easier to move an agenda forward. Collaborating with the Bike Coalition, we’ve made significant positive change.
  • Transportation isn’t a sexy issue, and most politicians ignore it. But, it matters more to people’s day-to-day lives than just about any other issue.

4. What are your legislative priorities in Sacramento to support San Francisco’s Transit-First policy?

-Increasing investment in transit: The State doesn’t invest enough in transit. Bay Area and LA need to create an urban transportation agenda to grow the pie for sustainable transportation modes.

-Providing regional leadership on transformative transit investments: Senators are in a unique role to advance key priorities, such as a second transbay tube, expanded subway service, extending Caltrain/High Speed Rail downtown, creating a regional bike network.

-Modernizing state law to reflect modern transportation: State vehicle/fire codes are designed for car-first/car-only transportation policies. We must update these codes to accommodate, not inhibit, safe/sustainable street design.

5. Our City has embraced and adopted Vision Zero, the goal to eliminate all fatalities and serious injuries on our streets by 2024. Do you support Vision Zero?

Yes

If “Yes,” the city has yet to make significant progress since the introduction of Vision Zero in 2014. In fact, fatalities are on the rise. What would you do as State Senator to help the city achieve Vision Zero?

  • More state funding for transit and safe street design for both bikes and pedestrians. The more people who take transit, the fewer cars on the street and the fewer collisions and fatalities.
  • Automated speed enforcement and more local flexibility around speed limits. Communities know best what works for their streets, and they understand the need for more consistent traffic enforcement.
  • Update outdated fire/vehicle codes to allow and promote safe street design rather than inhibit good design.
  • Better state law allowing video enforcement against double parking. Double parking forces bikes into traffic and increases risk.

6. The draft California Transportation Plan 2040 calls for a doubling of bicycling statewide. Caltrans has committed to tripling bicycle mode share from 1.5% to 4.5% by 2020. As State Senator, would you support increasing bicycle trips in California? 

Yes

If “Yes,” what would you do as State Senator to help grow the number of people biking statewide?

As described in more detail above, I support policies and funding to transition more people out of cars and into transit, cycling, and other sustainable transportation modes. Fewer cars on the street means safer streets and more incentive to bike. I support changes to state law to encourage, rather than inhibit, safe street design. The better we design our streets to be safe and multi-modal, the more people will bike. I support more funding for building out complete bike networks. The more integrated and all-encompassing our bike networks, the more people will bike.

7. California’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund has been used to fund bicycle projects with the goal of reducing state greenhouse gas emissions. Do you support increased allocation and funding for bike projects? 

Yes

If “Yes,” what funding opportunities do you see at the state level to get bicycle projects on the ground?

The State should provide funding, including matching funds, for local communities to build out bike networks. We need to provide strong financial incentives for local communities to create complete streets and connected bike networks.

8. The California Air Resources Board recently included bike share in its Car Sharing and Mobility Options pilot program, opening up funding opportunities to expand bike share in low-income areas. Do you support the expansion of bike share and other bicycle infrastructure into low-income areas?

Yes

If “Yes,” how would you address low-income areas’ transportation needs as State Senator?

As a Commissioner on the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, I played a key role bringing about expanded bike share to the Bay Area. We must ensure bike share extends to *all* communities, including all geographic areas and low-income communities. Bike share promises to make it easier for people to get around – including people in low income communities who don’t have cars and lack access to great public transportation – and to make people healthier. Low income communities disproportionately suffer from diabetes and other health problems, and the more active we can help people be, the better. [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

Return to November 2016 Candidate Summaries

2016 State Senate District 11 Candidate Jane Kim

Candidate Facts

S11JK    Name: Jane Kim
   Campaign Website: www.janekim.org

Candidate Questionnaire

All official candidates were contacted and given the opportunity to answer our Candidate Questionnaire. Any candidate responses edited for length and clarity have been marked as such.

1. Do you ride a bicycle in the city or in Sacramento?

Yes

If “Yes,” how often do you ride and for what purpose(s)?

I bike and walk as part of my personal commitment to be one fewer car on the road. As a beginning cyclist, I have become comfortable biking to work and short distances around SoMa and the Tenderloin. I am the cyclist I consider when advocating for bike lanes–I am more likely to bike if there are separated bike lanes and available bike racks to ensure I can park my bike when I reach my destination. As our city grows in density, we must build infrastructure and a culture that encourages and incentivizes our residents/workers to bike.

2. One of the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition’s top state legislative priorities is Automated Speed Enforcement, recognizing that speed is the top factor in traffic collision fatalities in San Francisco. The San Francisco Board of Supervisors has passed a resolution in support of ASE and it is the SF Municipal Transportation Agency’s top legislative priority in Sacramento. Do you support legislation that would authorize the use of ASE as a pilot in San Francisco?

Yes

If “Yes,” would you sponsor this bill and why? If “No,” what change would make you consider supporting such legislation?

I absolutely support this initiative and would sponsor this bill and have advocated to our local delegation to take up this legislation. Engineering, education, and enforcement are important components of Vision Zero, but we will not decrease fatalities and injuries if we do not reduce speed. Speed is the number one factor in determining the safety of all individuals involved in the case of a collision. I also support decreasing speed limits.

3. What have you learned as District Supervisor in San Francisco that will help inform you if elected State Senator?

My experience as a Community Organizer and Supervisor representing a very diverse community–low-income SRO tenants, immigrants, a growing senior population, at-risk youth, and homeless adults and families–as well as the district with the highest rate of pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities, has greatly influenced me as a legislator. I work to include a diverse array of community members when drafting legislation, negotiating housing development deals, and developing priorities for initiatives like Vision Zero. Because close to 80% of all of San Francisco’s development takes place in my district, I have gained substantive expertise in the land use process. [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

4. What are your legislative priorities in Sacramento to support San Francisco’s Transit-First policy?

The safety of people biking will continue to be one of my priorities at the local and State level. If elected to the Senate, I will also prioritize housing affordability, tenant protections, higher education, and reforming our broken criminal justice system. Part of supporting a more affordable Bay Area means making smart, equitable, and data-driven investments in housing, education, and an affordable regional public transportation system, including high speed rail, a second BART tube, increased regional ferry and bus service, the downtown extension of Caltrain along with electrification, and further encouraging Caltrans’ to adopt innovative street designs that promote biking.

5. Our City has embraced and adopted Vision Zero, the goal to eliminate all fatalities and serious injuries on our streets by 2024. Do you support Vision Zero?

Yes

If “Yes,” the city has yet to make significant progress since the introduction of Vision Zero in 2014. In fact, fatalities are on the rise. What would you do as State Senator to help the city achieve Vision Zero?

As the primary author and most vocal champion of Vision Zero, I know we must prioritize re-engineering and design of our streets to prevent conflicts between pedestrians, cyclists, drivers, and large vehicle drivers. Funding is no longer the issue–it’s become a matter of leadership and will. The near-time pilots on Folsom and Howard are great, but we need to push through separated bike lanes on these corridors and more. I will be holding a hearing on bike safety in September to request clear deliverables and timelines for protected bike lanes. As Senator, I will implement ASE. [RESPONSE TRUNCATED]

6. The draft California Transportation Plan 2040 calls for a doubling of bicycling statewide. Caltrans has committed to tripling bicycle mode share from 1.5% to 4.5% by 2020. As State Senator, would you support increasing bicycle trips in California? 

Yes

If “Yes,” what would you do as State Senator to help grow the number of people biking statewide?

We are focusing on building livable urban neighborhoods with housing near public transportation hubs that prioritize and plan for walking, bicycling, and carpool options. I have worked closely with the Planning Department and developers to plan for and invest in biking infrastructure. When negotiating large developments, I collaborate with SFBC to ensure that developers consider bicycling in the project and invests in the neighborhood’s streets. I have made certain developers agree to reduce parking spots and to strategically place garage entrances and exits to best prevent conflict with cyclists by working with statewide advocacy organizations like Cal Walks and Calbikes.

7. California’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund has been used to fund bicycle projects with the goal of reducing state greenhouse gas emissions. Do you support increased allocation and funding for bike projects? 

Yes

If “Yes,” what funding opportunities do you see at the state level to get bicycle projects on the ground?

We cannot close the income/opportunity gap if we don’t have access to safe, reliable, and affordable transportation, which is the second biggest expense in a family budget. I am committed to examining the State’s budget and working closely with SFBC and other bicycle advocates to invest in bikeable cities, reduce vehicle congestion, and improve regional public transit systems. I have supported a variety of revenue measures dedicated to funding public transit and Vision Zero, including the GO Bond for Transportation and the Population Growth Charter Amendment, and I support forwarding the VLF increase in San Francisco and statewide.

8. The California Air Resources Board recently included bike share in its Car Sharing and Mobility Options pilot program, opening up funding opportunities to expand bike share in low-income areas. Do you support the expansion of bike share and other bicycle infrastructure into low-income areas?

Yes

If “Yes,” how would you address low-income areas’ transportation needs as State Senator?

I have intentionally organized a diverse pedestrian and bike safety coalition, which includes low-income families, seniors, SRO residents, young professionals, and condo homeowners in our Vision Zero Work Group Meetings. I worked to develop Vision Zero resident leaders in the Tenderloin. I pushed for a pedestrian and bike redesign study of 6th Street and bike lanes on Golden Gate and Polk, and I’m a strong supporter of open street programs like Sunday Streets and Yellow Bike. I will continue this work in Sacramento and explore ways to allow low-income individuals access to Bike Share programs.

Return to November 2016 Candidate Summaries