Candidate Facts
Name: Jane Kim Campaign Website: www.janekim.org |
Candidate Questionnaire
Last month, all official candidates for the Board of Supervisors were contacted and given the opportunity to answer our Candidate Questionnaire. Any candidate responses edited for length and clarity have been marked as such.
1. Do you ride a bicycle in the city?
Yes [response truncated]
2. If yes, for what purpose(s) and how often? How do you most commonly commute to work?
As a beginning cyclist, I have become comfortable biking to work by myself (it’s a short commute!), but I still don’t feel comfortable biking to other destinations without friends. This experience has only strengthened my resolve to ensure protected or separated bike lanes whether it’s Folsom/Howard, 2nd Street, Polk, or other major corridors and more bike racks to ensure that cyclists can park their bike when they reach their destination.
3. The City has established a goal to at least double the number of bike trips in the next 4 years. Do you support this goal?
Yes
If yes, what would you do as Supervisor to help the city realize it?
We must get people out of cars and on public transit, bikes, and their feet, and do so safely. I’ll continue to push a culture shift within City agencies and the public through implementing and monitoring Vision Zero. Working with SFBC and WalkSF, we have garnered commitments from SFPD and SFMTA, and we must continue to push for implementation. We must continue to balance long-term safety improvements and near-term pilots in our highest injury corridors.
4. After a tragic 2013 for people biking and walking, including 25 fatal collisions, City leaders have embraced Vision Zero, which aims to reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries to zero in the next 10 years through better engineering, education, and enforcement. This policy has now been adopted by the Board of Supervisors, the Mayor and many key agencies, such as the SFMTA & the Police Dept. Do you support Vision Zero?
Yes [response truncated]
As Supervisor will you prioritize funding and policy decisions based on Vision Zero, or safety-first?
Yes [response truncated]
5. It has been shown that the most effective way to boost the number of people bicycling and improve the bicycling experience is to designate dedicated space through physically separated bikeways and traffic-calmed streets. The SF Bicycle Coalition has set out its Connecting the City initiative, an ambitious but achievable vision of 100 miles of crosstown bikeways that are comfortable and inviting for people of all ages and abilities, connecting neighborhoods and helping locals and visitors to shop, work, and play more often by bike. Reconfiguring our streets to include crosstown bikeways and other “low stress” bike routes will draw concern from some residents who are skeptical of this next-generation infrastructure and who oppose re-programming any existing on-street car parking or traffic lanes for safer biking.
Do you support the creation of continuous crosstown bikeways — Connecting the City — even acknowledging that there will be some public pushback to inevitable changes?
Yes [response truncated]
6. The SF Bicycle Coalition has advocated for the City to increase its spending on bicycling improvements, so that it constitutes 8% of its transportation budget, given that the SFMTA’s Strategic Plan goal aims to reach 8% of trips by bike by 2018. In its most recent budget cycle, the SFMTA only increased the funding for bicycling from 1% to 2%. As Supervisor, will you support leveling the playing field by ensuring that the level of funding for bicyclists at least matches the proportion of San Franciscans that bike?
Yes [response truncated]
7. The affordability of transportation is a growing concern for many San Franciscans. For most SF residents, particularly low-income families, transportation is the second-highest cost of living after housing. As Supervisor, how will you promote bicycling as an affordable transportation choice, particularly for among households overburdened by expenses?
I am intentional about building a diverse coalition of residents around ped/bike safety– low-income families, seniors, SRO residents, young professionals, and condo homeowners. want to ensure bike access and parking for our low income residents and a strong advocate for Tenderloin Sunday Streets . I supported Yellow Bike Project in finding a space in the Tenderloin for kid bike swaps and rode and co-sponsored Avalos’s legislation to mandate SRO property owners to secure tenant bicycles.
8. Market Street is San Francisco’s most well-traveled corridor, with a quarter of a million daily transit vehicle boardings on or under it each weekday and more daily bike trips than almost any other street in the United States. The City is working on a Better Market Street plan that calls for limiting private vehicle thru-traffic, creating a continuous, physically separated bikeway the full length of Market Street, while also enhancing better transit and pedestrian travel. Would you support this plan?
Yes [response truncated]
9. This Fall, voters will have the chance to support the Transportation and Road Safety Bond. This bond supports $500 million of work to improve the city’s transit systems and make our roadways safer for all users, with a focus on improved bikeways and pedestrian safety. Will you publicly support and actively campaign for this measure?
Yes [response truncated]
10. Also this Fall, voters will be presented with a ballot measure called Policy Regarding Transportation Priorities Declaration of Policy or “Transportation Balance”, which aims to weaken San Francisco’s long-time Transit-First policy, and send more of our City’s scarce resources to further subsidize parking to the detriment of other, well-established priorities, including transit and the safety of people walking and biking. Will you support Transit-First and Vision Zero by publicly and actively opposing the Policy Regarding Transportation Priorities Declaration.
Yes [response truncated]
11. In 2016, San Franciscans will be asked to restore the Vehicle License Fee to 2% to provide an ongoing, progressive source of funding for transportation priorities in San Francisco, including safer walking and biking conditions and improved transit. Do you endorse this revenue source?
Yes [response truncated]
If yes, will you also support bridge-funding for the transportation funding gap until this funding measure is active?
Yes [response truncated]
12. San Francisco has recently joined a growing list of major cities with sophisticated bike sharing programs. To succeed, this program will require significant expansion to neighborhoods across the city, which will require additional funding and public space for the bike-sharing station. Do you commit to seek and secure funding and space to expand this cost-effective, innovative new transportation system to more San Francisco neighborhoods?
Yes [response truncated]
13. Double-parking in bike lanes is a major safety problem in San Francisco, causing people biking to have to swerve dangerously. Will you prioritize a significant increase in the SF Police Department’s and the SFMTA’s Parking Control Officers’ enforcement of this problem?
Yes [response truncated]
14. Concerns around police enforcement of safe driving laws in San Francisco is high. 1,700 people have signed a petition to urge George Gascon to prosecute the driver in the Amelie Le Moullac bike fatality case. Do you support increased enforcement and accountability for all road users focused around the five most dangerous driving actions (speeding, failing to stop for pedestrians in the crosswalk, improperly making a right hand turn, running red lights, and failing to stop at stop signs)?
Yes [response truncated]
15. Have you championed or strongly supported any other initiatives that are in line with the SF Bicycle Coalition’s mission of promoting bicycling for everyday transportation?
Pedestrian Safety work group which has grown to become an overall street safety workgroup and advocate for priorities around safety that come out of these workgroup meetings through funding or agency actions.
District-Specific Questions
1. As the Waterfront and especially the Embarcadero become increasingly popular with tourists and residents alike, do you support a continuous, physically protected bikeway along the Embarcadero to reduce congestion, increase comfort and safety and improve circulation?
Yes [response truncated]
2. The SoMa and Tenderloin neighborhoods are known as some of the areas where bicycling is growing at the fastest rate, yet they are also the most intimidating and dangerous neighborhoods for people biking or walking. Will you support a clear and well-funded Vision Zero mandate on SoMa and Tenderloin streets?
Yes [response truncated]
3. Specifically, will you support the addition of physically protected bikeways on the following key streets in SoMa and the Tenderloin, even knowing that there will likely be some loss of parking and/or existing travel lanes?:
- 2nd Street Yes
- 5th Street Yes
- 6th Street Yes
- 7th Street Yes
- 8th Street Yes
- Folsom Street Yes
- Howard Street Yes
- 13th/Divison Streets Yes
- Turk Street Yes
- Golden Gate Street Yes
- Polk Street Yes
4. When the Warriors arena moves to District 6, it will be very important to find ways to minimize congestion. Will you support significantly improved and expanded bicycle infrastructure around the proposed stadium site, in order to make it easy and safe for people to attend the games by foot or on bicycle, particularly from key transit stations like 16th and Mission BART and Caltrain?
Yes [response truncated]